ABDUL RASHID versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY), MUZAFFARABAD
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 Section 4 The appointment of section Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), the order of appointment of the District Education Officer, without giving any reason and without the opportunity for civil opportunity. Of the hearing. The appointment of employees who did not apply or did not appear in the test or interview, on behalf of civil servants, the Valediction Service Tribunal dismissed the order on the basis of the request of public employees that the matter was settled. I have a request for Divisional Director schools and was not implemented. Appeal was not authorized, the order of appointment clearly states that the District Education Officer issued, not by the Divisional Director of Schools as claimed by the plaintiff that the Divisional Director was present at the termination order. No order of off-school instruction will be given. Cancellation of Government Employee Appointment Recorded On the record, the order of cancellation of the appointment of public servant was given on the record by the District Education Officer's ad order, however, there was a non-speaking order except for no reason. Because the directive was neither present in the test / interview nor after its name appeared on the merit list, it did not qualify for the appointment of a government employee whose name was on the top of the merit list, the Service Tribunal The order was set aside under which the appeal of the government employees was dismissed on technical grounds, the appointment of public servants. Or order was restored in the
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer