Find a Lawyer

JAVED AKHTAR versus SHER MUHAMMAD

The applicant has approved the validity of such an order in favor of the previous order, section 12 (2) of section 12 (2) of the boundary act (M of 1908), section 3 and article 181 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), article 185 (3). Challenged but the same application was rejected on December 7, 1983, after 7 years of silence, the applicants stated that on July 19, 1990, on December 23, 1979, the former party decree filed the petitioners under section 12 (2). The application was rejected, the first appellate court and the High Court affirming where it had jurisdiction to submit a forum or pass an order, then the offending party must, at least from the academic date From the short academic date, the same forum will have to be challenged before the higher forum within the stipulated period. The Act, 1908, was in force and they could challenge it within three years with the knowledge of Article 181, the Limitation Act, 1908, which would show that the period would be counted. At the time when the reasons for the action were gathered, even if liberality offered the right to challenge the former party decree on January 10, 1983, when they became aware of the same news when such a decree was challenged in 1990, So under Section 12 (2) the application, with no weakness in the fact finding by the High Court, the CPC was expressly banned, no interference was guaranteed. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Layyah lawyer