Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR DADABHOY versus SECRETARY P.E.C.H.S

The case of Mohammedan Law of Oral Gift in favor of Son Housing Society which contained the property under the said refusal to record the mutation was based on the fact that the gift process is an unregistered document, thus the confession cannot be recorded by any person. According to personal law, Muslims are following the faith. To whom he was subject, in his life gifts could be wasted on him or any part of his property. For this purpose, registration was not a regular condition under the Registration Act, 1908. In the transfer of Section 129, the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the rules of Muslim law were explicitly exempt from the operation of a specific chapter. Which is related to gifts and such emissions have been extended. Consequently, this section of the Property Transfer Act, 1882, which is in 128, requires the registration and confirmation of at least two witnesses on all transfers through the gift of registration property. Nothing in the Registration Act, 1908, was deviated from the terms of such exclusion. A gift through a donor, a declaration under a personal law. Acceptance of the gift through the deed; and the delivery of the occupation of the corpse, however, must be satisfied; neither the local authority, nor the government itself, can ignore such gift-giving transaction in which the Muslim Personal Law has been established. There were satisfactory requirements that the rights under his personal law were further strengthened by registration. Article 2A in the Dastur Housing Society refuses to change the names of the works done in the record and is required to pass the Property Transfer Act (I82 of 1882), famous lower court advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer