Find a Lawyer

TOWN COMMITTEE, KHEWRA versus SALEH BIBI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) Payment of Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 15 (2) and payment of 17 wages The employee was paying his claim on salaries, gratuities, Salary Payment Act, 1936 Approached the authority under For the disputed period, the Additional Compensation Authority recorded the evidence of employment on the same day when the transactions were taking place and the employers' evidence was closed and only two dates were added to the evidence, while in its order the Authority stated that Many opportunities were provided for the guidance of the employees, but on their failure to do so, the claims of the employees were decided on the power of proof, which led them to authorize the employers to examine the employees in relation to the employees. Was not allowed, therefore, to take action against employers and inappropriately in favor of the employee. Was. And the reasons given by the authority in deciding the unjustified hurry were also insufficient because it simply stated that the employee had the evidence again, allegedly to establish his claim. I was successful, which was not really examined by the Authority using its free mind, the authority also requested the employer to review the employer's request against the order passed by him. Was rejected upon receiving an answer. The authority did not have the power to revise its powers The appeal against the authority's decision was rejected by the Labor Court in a specific way, as well as the authority, as well as the Labor Court, were negligent about the employers' case. law websites from Upper Deval lawyer