Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE

Large quantities of heroin powder were recovered from the driver's vehicle, secret caves of Article 157 (2) and 178 of the Customs Act 1969 (XLV of 1860), Article 34 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution. Along with some passengers. A student at a college student who was not present in the vehicle at the time, requested to have the vehicle taken into custody, denied that the person responsible for confiscating the goods Period of liability with the person liable for confiscation \ As under Section 157 (2), Customs Act, 1969 Convention Section 178, Customs Act, 1969 Section 178, Customs Act 1969, Section 34, PPC Consistent, even in the absence of a car owner, he may be held guilty. Offense provided that such owner is aware of the fact that a person cannot be deprived of his property by a fine unless he is somehow responsible for assisting or advancing it. The commission of the crime requires an inquiry / inquiry to prove the knowledge of the owner not present in the vehicle, which the petitioner's case lacks. The nature of the proceedings before the judgment is termed a judicial period - Automatic liability for confiscation will not automatically identify the confiscated tribunal about the absence of the car owner from the incident and the presence of the confiscated equipment on his vehicle. Failure to record some evidence of information about the owner was unsuccessful, therefore, the authorities simply approved the inadmissible orders for no apparent reason. Special Judge Customs acquitted of the charges and three passengers of the vehicle were convicted advocate for immigration from Sheikhupura lawyer