Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LIMITED, KARACHI versus JAVED LQBAL

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (i), Sections Oz 12 and 15 Maintaining a Workman's Complaint Petition Employee Challenge to the removal from By filing a complaint before the Labor Court, though he was designated as a security officer, his job was to check the work of the watchmen, who were 18 and to do so by footwork. And could not be considered to operate in any administrative or supervisory capacity, even on the reason / charge sheet contents issued by the employer to the employee indicating that the action against the employee was in West Pakistan Industrial And is proposed to begin under Sections 12 and 15 of the commercial employment. (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 and these provisions were intended only for workers and not for other types of staff to establish that there was no employee thus the worker was transferred to the job, but the employer was relieved. I was unsuccessful even if the security guard and the member of the Watch & Ward could legally maintain a complaint request under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, requesting, thus, retained by the employees Was able to advocate from Depal Pur lawyer