Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF ALIAS APPO versus THE STATE

Section 265C of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), 265 F & 439 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 18 Document verification was presented to the court after police preparation, examining a prosecution witness During the investigation, the complainant attempted to present some records as exhibits relating to the ownership of the jewelry, which were related to the wealth, it was alleged by the accused that after the completion of the challan, section 265 List of witnesses and all relevant documents, including challan, for the amendment of the law under CCP The receipts that were presented by the prosecution were neither mentioned nor included in the list of documents, they could not be presented during the trial because they would have to fill in the surviving lacon. ? Prosecution and defense will adversely affect the case. The accused also alleged that the receipts produced were fabricated and prepared. Prove the properties of the jewelry that were allegedly recovered from the accused after his arrest. The complainant's request was that the attempted receipt of the exhibit was found during the search of the house after the robbery and murder, which is why such receipts did not come with the challan. The court could not deny the admissibility of documents that were appropriate for the trial decision and the basis of the defendant's objection was not well established because there was a difference between civil and criminal proceedings in which different procedures were based on documented evidence. The acknowledgment of the document that was present could not be disputed. Or ask on that basis how to become a advocate from Multan lawyer