Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAHEEN IQBAL versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Pakistan Jail Rules 1978 Section 5 (2) (f) Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 156 (1) (8) (89) Pakistan Jail Rules, 1978, RR 36 and 37 of the Constitution of Paulsen (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant The applicant's husband was sentenced to seven years in prison when he was transferred to the United States to face trial in that country, when the petitioner's husband was sent back to Pakistan after being sentenced to imprisonment. ? In this case, the rest of the sentence had to be spent in which he was convicted in Pakistan and he was serving his sentence at the time he was rescued from extradition and the rest of the cases also faced trial which is currently pending. Were, Judicial Rules & 36 and, 37, Pakistan Jail Rules, while for the suspension of punishment of the offender during the 197 provision, the sentence will be considered suspended till the date of suspension when he will be resurrected and the rest of the sentence is non-existent. The finished section will be affected. The applicant's husband will be deemed to have been suspended upon his extradition and will be restored upon his return when the applicant's husband will have to face the rest of the sentence and no exemption can be taken in the same obstruction act 1972 or No other law provided it. In order to guarantee that the government violated any legal provision in handing over a guilty plea to the state, the criminal liability of the offender should be waived and the pending cases withdrawn. Go, however, the petitioner's husband was given the benefit of the time spent in jail in Pakistan, in the United States District Court in the United States, the petitioner's husband was entitled to pardon her sentence and to withdraw the remaining cases only. us immigration advocates from Okara lawyer