MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for Tehsil Passage Auction of fisheries rights, which was the highest bidder's specific amount including security auction, however, It was not approved and instead there was another auction. The result did not yield any result, after which, the applicant asked to participate in another auction and was told that his bid was not accepted, the petitioner claimed to have his refund. Which he submitted to the plaintiff, however, no action was taken. Represented at auction 5 8 1997, the defendant sat on the file for more than three months. Meanwhile, two auctions were made but no results were made. After filing a constitutional petition, the defendants informed the applicant that their bid had been accepted. The acceptance of the applicant's bid was solely unreasonable in detecting the crime of his own and the responsible worker was violating the terms of his duty as trustee of the property of such officers. The inaction on the side caused tremendous damage to the treasury. The respondents were instructed to return immediately. Earlier a copy of the applicant's money order submitted by him was sent to the Chief Secretary as well as the Secretary Fisheries to take appropriate action against the default personnel responsible for all such damages and their inaction. Due to the loss of the national treasury report. The result of such an exercise is a positive two months of theirs
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Chaghi lawyer