Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SALAM THAHIM versus RETURNING OFFICER AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHAHDADPUR

On the basis of the provisions of sections 55 and 63 of the Representation of the Public Act 1976, the petitioner on the request of the retired candidate to exclude the election petition filed against him, it is stated that compliance with the mandatory provisions of Section 55, Representation Public Act 1976 Was not made and this applicant has. Details of the alleged malicious methods were not disclosed. The main pressure of the retired candidate was to verify the election request, attach the documents and attach it to the supplementary law, which was partially lacking, however, mentioning specific election paragraphs. The application, which, to the best of the applicants' knowledge, was proven correct, and the paragraphs on which the applicant believed the election petition as a true endorsement had the effect that the applicant was in the process of confirming the affirmation. As well as confirm that what is stated in paragraph above. To the best of my knowledge regarding election 1 to 20 are true and correct. The petition will show that the applicant has stated that all the paragraphs of the election application were true and correct to the best of their knowledge. He did not ask any paragraph to be true to his belief that such a certified, returning candidate had requested to exclude the election petition under Section 63, Representative People Act 1976, , In the circumstances it was not guaranteed. famous high court advocate from Daud Khel lawyer