In contempt of court contempt of the contempt of court Act 1976 1976, who was the investigating officer in the case registered under sections 489b, 489c and 120b. It was reported that he made the wrong statement. In the very history of the issuance of notice under Section 3 of the contempt of court Act, 1976, the accused was found guilty of contempt of court without charge and was found guilty and was found guilty He was convicted of a speaking order offense. False statement would be governed by section 193, PPC, which was not made against the accused when the accused requested that he submit a security printing press report when it was received. , The trial court was obliged to wait until such report was received. According to the Security Printing Press report that the currency involved in the criminal case was forged, the accused was not declared guilty and was sentenced to contempt of court. According to the order of our trial, the accused was convicted and sentenced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
