MUHAMMAD YAR AND 5 OTHERS versus THE STATE
Appreciating the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34, 302/109 and 120B was not fatal to the prosecution case for the absence of a person to appear in the special circumstances of the traumatic event. And the prosecution did not adversely affect the prosecution and the witnesses in the site's absence of witnesses. The presence of eyewitnesses was natural on the occasion, and the reluctance and hostility in their statements was affected by the fact that prior criminal cases were registered and framed between the parties. The suspect was free from suspicion The number of wounds on each of the five dead bodies has proven that the witnesses seen in the FIR have been used by eyewitnesses during the presence of al-Bibi. was done. There was also a controversial piece of evidence against the recovery of the weapons of the crime and the eviction of criminals with the help of witnesses and other material against the accused. Based on information from the chemical executor and serologist, the suspect contacted the incident in which five people were killed. The number of accused is five under which they are responsible under section 2302 / 9able9, their punishment and conviction is maintained in the circumstances, however, the accused's involvement under Sections 302/109 and 120B, PPC. It seems to have been prepared and cooked afterwards by a police officer, and accordingly he was acquitted of the charges.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer