Find a Lawyer

HANIFA BA versus MUHAMMAD MUSA

The trial court ruled in this regard in section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and in the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional application for the restoration of the wife, while the appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's claim as legal. He was ordered to be employed and had a rickshaw through which he was earning 50 rupees daily, the trial court was not allowed to recover Rs 1500 a month on this month. In the circumstances, the wife was not entitled to past or future care; therefore, there was no justification, therefore, there existed to interfere with the decision of the appellate court in which she did not find the wife entitled to care. ? Exercising constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution famous high court advocate from Mansehra lawyer