Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HANIFA BA versus MUHAMMAD MUSA


The trial court ruled in this regard in section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and in the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional application for the restoration of the wife, while the appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's claim as legal. He was ordered to be employed and had a rickshaw through which he was earning 50 rupees daily, the trial court was not allowed to recover Rs 1500 a month on this month. In the circumstances, the wife was not entitled to past or future care; therefore, there was no justification, therefore, there existed to interfere with the decision of the appellate court in which she did not find the wife entitled to care. ? Exercising constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Lalamusa lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.