Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZZAK BILLOO versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497, 154 and 155 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), 5 109/275/274/468/471 Drugs Act ( XXXI's 1976), Sections 27 (2) and 30 (2) bail, the grant of the FIR on the basis of which the advertisement of the proceedings was initiated, after the complainant was not signed, without legal action Was not compliant, a case was registered against the accused. On the complaint of Federal Inspector Drugs by the Assistant Director, FIA, while pursuant to a notification issued by the Ministry of Interior and Drug Control under Section HO No. 826 (1) / 97, dated 209 1997, Sections 468 and 471. The PPC was taken out. The schedule and the FIA were dropped for investigating the matter, PPC was never included in the schedule, they were not in the FIA's scope for investigation of section 30 (2). , Under the Drugs Act 1976 Section 27 (2) of the Drugs Act, 1976 is unreasonable and also that no court other than drugs will try to convict the court under an offense which states that the maximum punishment for the accused is 7 years. Allegedly, the prohibition clause of section 497 will be removed, the PCP will provide guarantees for the accused, while denial is exempt. Further investigations were needed against the accused and in the absence of any reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was the perpetrator of the crime, the accused was entitled to be released on bail. divorce advocates from Hangu lawyer