Find a Lawyer

SUGHRA BEGUM versus HIRJA BAHI DAR-E-MEHAR

Section 15 (2) (ii) in the payment of the tenants, the tenants claimed that they had paid the landlord the disputed rent, but if no receipt was issued to them by the landlord, they could make it through a money order. Received the rent which was refused and then began collecting the rent in the tenants court dispute that they had sent the disputed rent through a money order, without any restriction, to enter the coupon without such money order. I failed because the landlord allegedly testified in his examination that the tenants should deposit some money He remained silent and submitted some rent after more than three years, thus, the tenants became defaulters and they were in a position to file a case for eviction when the default period exceeds three years. Could not be done best law firms from Jamrud Road lawyer