Find a Lawyer

QUTAB-UD-DIN ALIAS QUTABA versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 399 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 Evidence Defined This raid was planned in advance despite the prosecution not sharing any public testimony. No explanation was provided. The time of recovery in the recovery process, and thus the alleged recovery of arms from the suspect by police officers, was not established because the alleged history of involvement of the accused in the robbery cases could not be proved on record, despite the complaint being alleged. After the weapons were not proven, it could not be said that he was preparing to commit the robberies, especially since he did not present any evidence to present any form of communication in such a case. Who was involved in the crime. Preparing to commit a robbery, which was missing in the prosecution case, the accused was acquitted in any case as the non-appealing accused were entitled to the same benefit as they were also acquitted because all citizens were equal before the law and the constitution Were entitled to equal protection of the law as provided under Article 25. us immigration advocates from Astore lawyer