FAZAL MUHAMMA versus THE STATE
West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance 1965 Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 171, 395 and 412 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D Guarantee, 22 days after the FIR's granting event Was told that more than 2/2 years had passed, but only two of the 14 prosecution witnesses were examined while the third prosecution witness's investigation was still ongoing and their case was further investigated. The contents of the FIR were safe for testing. It is revealed that the accused did not resort to terrorism or brutality to intimidate the complainant and other prosecution witnesses for the alleged crime of robbery and the accused requested by the accused was a harsh, frustrated or dangerous criminal. There is no guarantee, therefore, that there is a one-year period to allow the accused to bail due to the trial delay.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Bisham lawyer
