Find a Lawyer

MASSODUL HASSAN versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Sections 13 and 15 of the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 were employed in a government job at the time of filing an application for the removal of the landlord's personal requirement even if he had retired at the time of his removal request. The landlord's requirement was premature at the time of filing the eviction application, but the one that was confirmed on the first appeal, should not have been neglected by the Appellate Forum without giving a valid reason, however, some Not at all, but the landlord will prevent the landlord from having the opportunity to evict the tenants. In the event that the landlord did not occupy the damaged premises, the law provided adequate protection, the tenant should have no fear of counting that the landlord's removal request The wrong premises were dealt with by dismissing and, therefore, unlawful orders were not sustainable in which case the tenant was allowed to evacuate. immigration advocate from Matli lawyer