Find a Lawyer

MUSTEHKUM CEMENT LIMITED versus ABDUL RASHID

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (i) and Section O12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXVIII of 1969), Section 25A Employees' Services with or Result of Industrial Disputes Has not been resolved to address the complaint of such worker, Section 25A, Section O12 (3) of the Regulation of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance. , Has been extended in 1968, therefore, such a worker is afforded the right to seek a solution, not Section 25A, the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 But also increase the strength of the provisions in the section of the Ordinance of 1968 VI 12 (3) of the respondents were not services. Terminated with or as a result of an industrial dispute, the right to redress their grievances was only available to them under Section 12 (3) of the Standing Orders Article. In such a situation, the Indian Labor Court will consider the definition of labor as included in section 2 (i), the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, as a person's status as a worker. The nature of the duties by which they perform the duties primarily performed by the respondents will certainly bring it into admiration of the \ labor as described in Section 2 (i). , The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, was the High Court, therefore, the respondents have the right to be a worker and they have to work. The search for forums was set aside correctly in which the respondent was not considered as an employee. The High Court concludes that famous lower court advocate from Daur lawyer