Find a Lawyer

NASEEM SAIGOL versus ALTAF HUSSAIN, LABOUR OFFICER AND INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES, CENTRAL DIVISION, SINDH, KARACHI

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2, 7, 10 and Section Oz 2, 4, 8 and 10 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 243 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request Complaint Against employer (s) for not issuing appointment letter to workers. The employer's conviction on the basis of such a complaint for non-issuance of cards and temporary cards to the temporary workers was based on their entry but the words used by the employers were not recorded as feasible and they Considered under Section 243, Criminal Code of Conduct, 1898, why they should not be punished, was not given the opportunity to show that the trial court not only recorded the entry of the accused in the words of the accused / employers. Was forced to do. But he was obliged to ask him why he should not be punished even though his crime was confessed. In my words the recording of the statement was not enough for the employees (offenders) and the matter went ahead. Was sent to the trial court to proceed. In accordance with the law registration advocate from Ratto Dero lawyer