Find a Lawyer

ASAD ALI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 177, 180 and 184 (3) Constitutional Request for the approval of the Chief Justice of Pakistan under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan: Appointment: The appointment of the Chief Justice of Pakistan was made under three judges or a court. For the senior person who was appointed Chief Justice of Pakistan without any concrete and valid reason, the appointment of such person as Chief Justice of Pakistan is completely unconstitutional, illegal and in the case of the Jihad Trust v Federation. I was against the Supreme Court verdict. The unconstitutional appointment of Pakistan PLD 1996 SC 324 gave rise to a recurring cause that continued till then, the person who took over the office of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, such as the Chief Justice of Pakistan. The appointment of a person is void, unconstitutional and there is no legal consequence. Failure to challenge his appointment as Chief Justice by the judges of the Supreme Court is a reminder to the court that he is in charge of the post of Chief Justice. Were senior to the person, neither were they required to accept the unconstitutional appointment, nor did such a mistake prevent them from doing so. Against the petitions of citizens who are and are upset with Pakistan. The unlawful appointment of the Chief Justice of Pakistan is not a violation of the law or against any constitutional provision, the Supreme Court has observed, in such circumstances, that the person will cease to assume the office of Chief Justice of Pakistan and will cease to hold office. Will order. The judges of the Supreme Court, according to their seniority, admitted to the judges of the Federal Government of the Supreme Court that the most senior judges of all the judges of the court should be appointed as the Chief Justice of Pakistan. best law firm from Chak Jamal lawyer