Sections 3 and 4 of the Accountability Ordinance 1996 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 497 allowed the loan / demand finance facility in favor of fugitive co-accused accused of being the president of the bank for passing the guarantee. The reason for such a move / mistake of the rupees accused without receiving any security from them was because of the fraudulent and illegal movement of the President of the bank, disregarding his powers and powers, which Wrong loss of millions of rupees The benefit of the fraudulent and fraudulent money on the record to the bank and this fugitive suspect clearly indicates that the accused was linked to corruption and misdemeanor crimes under Section 3, Accountability Ordinance. Is punishable by death, lift or 10 years imprisonment, although as a rule it was to be adopted and denied was the case of the accused (7 years imprisonment) in the category of extraordinary circumstances. Because he used to put money or trust in the bank by the common people through millions of rupees through this financial misconduct and fraud. In view of the wrongdoing of the party and the party who acted dishonestly, fraudulently and illegally, the possibility of the accused being a fugitive cannot be ruled out, as most people are already charged with such crimes. The fugitives, therefore, were not prepared to expand the accused. On guarantee
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
