Find a Lawyer

KHURRAM SHAHZAD versus UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR

The CCP appearance and non-submission of the result of the CCC by the C OCC, R 13 and the CCC Code Order IX in the Section 115 suit, setting forth the preceding party decree under the special performance order The trial court dismissed the request for separation of the former party's decree against the defendant. The alternative services were legally impeached by the appellate court, however, referring the earlier order to the trial court for fresh judgment on the merit, while overturning the trial court's order. The applicant had declined to accept the statement of key witness. Based on the fact that he was the guardian of another village and that the school in which he worked was under the control of the applicant, there could be no reasonable exception to the trial court in ignoring this aspect of the case. , The trial court overlooked the essential truth. The appellate court's question was not specified for the implementation of this agreement, as it was found that the alleged alternative services were not served by drumming by the applicant's key witness; The court could not file a lawsuit to interfere with the review process by claiming that it had learned of the former party decree two days before filing. An application for non-disputing of the previous party decree by the applicant shall be filed within 30 days from the date of knowledge for the separation of the former party decree and thus within a good time period. famous supreme court advocate from Machh lawyer