Find a Lawyer

MUSTEHKUM CEMENT LIMITED versus ABDUL RASHID

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and a Constitution of 25 Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Employee status dispute 7 Employee status dispute Labor forum did not tell employee, therefore, complained The plea was rejected as a High Court of Appeal, however, it was found that the employee was an employee and it was executed to the best of his ability. The Validity Establishment claimed that the employee was performing the duties, considering the definition of the employee given in Section 2 (xxviii), Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. As supervisor and administrative ability, he was appointed as manager, his salary is more than Rs 4,000 per month, therefore, he cannot be considered a laborer. And even if the employee is considered an employee, the High Court, having established its opinion in the constitutional jurisdiction, withdrew its jurisdiction from deciding its case on the merits of which there was no dispute of the High Court. Can be picked up law firms from Ratto Dero lawyer