Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RICE CANAL, LARKANA

Article 4 Constitution of Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant On his retirement, the applicant was appointed on the basis of his son's alleged policy that the retired as well as the children of the deceased employees. Was to be considered for appointment. If he was otherwise eligible and eligible for the job on a priority basis, then the cancellation of the appointment order after the execution and validation of the position was resumed after the completion of all formal requirements, including medical fitness. And was a member of the GP Fund. It was also deducted from his salary - the appointment for only 90 days contradicted the words appearing in his appointment letter such as on the appointment of respondent applicants against clear vacancy due to the applicant's retirement. Can't dispute. The son was made against the vacant position on the basis of the applicant's retirement and on the basis of the government policy, send the son of the retired or deceased employee to the job on a priority basis, otherwise the appointment order if he was fit and eligible The cancellation of, therefore, was not guaranteed by the law and in the circumstances it was set aside. criminal advocate from Sita Road lawyer