ANWAR SAIFULLAH KHAN versus PASSPORT AND IMMIGRATION OFFICER GOV. OF PAKISTAN UNIVERSITY TOWN
Section 2 and 3 of the Pakistan (Control) Ordinance 1981 and Exit 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Natural Justice, Applicants' name was admitted in accordance with the principle laid down in the Exit Control List. No opportunity to be heard. In supplying the Article 2, the Pakistan Exit Ordinance, 1981, the government was granted an exemption from the need for a hearing before the injunction against the bereaved person was, however, justified, however, by the Ordinance. 3 when it submitted its review. Applying to the Federal Government against an order passed under section 2 of the Ordinance Act of Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981, being a valid law, allows the Federal Government to name anyone in the Exit Control List without cause. Allows the opportunity to listen to notes or opportunities for. Except for the application of the rule of natural justice when passing an order under section 2 of the Ordinance Facts under which references against the applicant were filed before the Accountability Commissioner, it was reasonable ground on which the applicant's name was included in the Exit Control List. Was to be named in the Exit Control List, therefore, there is no violation of any law applicant. Cannot be included in such a list indefinitely, and if the accountability process against the applicant is found to be inappropriate and irrevocably delayed, he or she will have the freedom to approach the court again.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Daud Khel lawyer