Section 2 (f) Landlord and Tenant Landlord Relationships Plaintiff sought to evict Appellant by relying on a tenant agreement but in an agreement in which defendant was not a party and his father was his He was said to be his lawyer. While dealing with the appellant, Syed's attorney signed the contract as a homeowner and issued rent receipts under his signature. The rent controller referred the respondent to the owner and consequently approved the removal of the appellant, which the respondents did not find. The father was acting as his lawyer while dealing with the appellant, he neither allowed him to leave the premises nor he had ever worked as a resident house in the sense of the Sindh tenant Premise Ordinance, 1979. The respondent declared himself in a relationship with the landlord and the landlord as his father and due to absence from the tenant parties, the eviction proceedings were not sustained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
