Find a Lawyer

ZONAL CHIEF, HABIB BANK LIMITED, BAHAWALPUR versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION .

Article 22A (8) (G) and 37 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Bank dismissed for employee misconduct, dismissed by the Labor Court His appeal was pending before the Labor Appellate Tribunal even when he approached the National Industrial Relations Commission for his complaint under which he was restored according to interim relief. Will be allowed to slip and unlawfully pass without recording any justification for the same mechanical fashion. The impugned order was passed without justification which could not be considered a legitimate use of force. Such a procedure was not ratified in order to summarize the matters with the illegal order. The parallel action under the Industrial Relations Ordinance failed to be seen by the National Industrial Relations Commission. com is pending before another court / tribunal of the jurisdiction of the employee in which he was not granted any relief, the effect of the punishment or punishment of the employee on the criminal offenses The final relief from the re-advance should not usually be approved while restoring it. Without interim orders there were very strong and extraordinary reasons for injunctive order, so, in the clear jurisdiction, the direct order of the National Industrial Relations Commission was found to be illegal and had no legal effect. The matter was referred to the National Industrial Relations Commission. Within a fixed period us immigration advocates from Multan lawyer