MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE
The absence of respectable persons from the area qualified to witness the collection of evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13, which was not difficult to associate with the Investigating Officer, especially when the accused was not alone. Confronted by the police party recovery, therefore, was not credible, nor was the evidence to prove it was a credible challan, although the weapon was presented under section 13B of the Ordinance 1965, but was subsequently charged. Was later enforced. An irregularity under the jurisdiction of the Special Judge for a trial under the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, led to the indictment of the crime which in the circumstances overruled the benefit of the doubt. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Fort Abbas lawyer
