Find a Lawyer

SARDAR KHAN versus REGISTRAR OF FIRMS (SOCIETIES)

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Sections 4 and 31 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition alleges the removal of the applicant's name from the respondent that the amended partnership agreement submitted by the firm to the Registrar was a forgery, The first mandatory component of the partnership should be the agreement, which according to the applicant itself, was never entered into and the dispute between the parties regarding the distribution of profit from the respondents, the reason for the removal of rock salt over a particular area of land. From the request of the Registrar of Firms, where there were genuine beneficiaries other than the firm's partners The specific part of the payee response, however, had nothing to do with the profit distribution mechanism, but only one of the partners was asked to request a firm's dismissal and the amended partnership to be invalidated. As a matter of fact, on the basis of the inquiry, which is the applicant for the revised, submitted registration of the partnership, the registrar containing the counterfeit signatures of the founding partners has concluded that the revised partnership The agreement is not genuine, it was not a mistake in the law to withdraw the amended partnership registration. The question is whether the revised partnership process is genuine or cannot be determined in a constitutional jurisdiction. Because, necessarily, the recording of the evidence will require the impugned order of the Registrar, thus interference with the constitutional jurisdiction will not be guaranteed. immigration advocate from Besham lawyer