Find a Lawyer

JAN MUHAMMA versus ABDUL REHMAN

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R-31 Judgment of the Judicial Trial Court Plaintiff, passed the order by the appellate court merely passing the record of the case and dismissing the memo of the Court of Appeal. Was set. The trial court did not record any reasons for rejecting the order, nor did it consider the evidence on the record, nor did it record any evidence-based reasons in the case, as it did not consider the facts of the trial. Didn't apply his mind to it, so, it couldn't. O XLI, in the sense of R 31, as a decision, the CPC appellate court was under a legal obligation to decide on each of the points involved. Describe your reasons for the decision; and to comply with the requirements of at least O XLI, R 31, CPC, which must be made clear by the decision that the appellate court has set its mind on the matter involved. Was applied consciously, which led to the court ruling its verdict. The impugned verdict shows that the appellate court did not consider the evidence on record and did not record any reason for its decision, thus dismissing the unwarranted verdict and order as improper judgment of the appellate court. The bail was set aside and the case remanded. By law, for a new decision patent advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer