MARRIAGE HALL ASSOCIATION versus CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Registration of the Societies Act 1860 Section 6 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 1, R8 The plaintiff (s) has any personal interest in filing a lawsuit as a body registered by the plaintiff (s). The injury was not reported. The plaintiff / sui court may register and maintain a case, but according to the rules of the society, such a case should be filed by its president, chairman or secretary, where the rules and regulations of the registered society authorize one of its officers. Was not given. In the present case, the Society can be filed in the name of any person / member appointed by the type of plant governing body, however, he was silent about the person through whom the order was being filed in the case. Showed that the Secretary General is authorized. The plaintiff / pleadings and the plaintiff did not file any copy of the Rules or Memorandum and Article Association to establish the case to indicate that such role was the Rules, Association or Memorandum Association. Or the Articles of Association had authorized the Secretary Society to institute suit suit (association) that at the time of the institute suit, there was no intention of filing an application like representative suit under Rule 1, R8. The CPC was tiled intermittently with an inaccurate and incomplete list of members from whom the association had to file a case or whom the participant applied for under the Rule 0 1, R 8. Therefore, the CPC was without qualification and was dismissed under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Taxila lawyer