Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIFEEN versus ALAMDAR HUSSAIN

The Act 1881 Section 92 check was issued by the Treasury to the Treasury Office by the Treasury, due to a restriction on all expenditures by the Provincial Government after the court issued a notice to the Treasury on the basis of the agreement between the parties. The money was retained. As defined in the definition of \ trusts \ and by no means the expense definition will not decrease as the restriction notification states that the restriction was imposed solely on expenses and not on the amount that the Treasury received. And was responsible for returning the parties. However, the expense ban was enforced on June 2, 1997, while the check was issued under reference on May 15, 1997, so the ban had no prior effect, therefore, the Treasury said, honoring the check. It would not, at that time, be subject to such restriction within the validity period, the checks issued as a result of the High Court order were not discharged, however, as a result, the High Court issued the Treasury Officer. The notice was deleted, which advised all government officials. Be careful and cautious when dealing with court proceedings best advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer