JAVAID IQBAL versus STATE
Testimony of Section 302/34 Investigating Agencies, the accused was discharged after he was found innocent, the prosecution did not specify any delay in recording the police statements of the eyewitnesses and they were present on the spot. Instead of the police at the police station. Eyewitnesses are closely related to the deceased, and due to litigation on the ground, they needed some autonomy of their testimony, which was not available. Nothing was recovered from the accused himself. Could not be the basis of the other. The suspects were given the benefit of the suspicion of the violent material and they were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer
