ISRARUL HAQ versus MIDWAY HOUSE (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 In a Complaint application, the authorized employee claimed that his wages should be paid in cash, not by check, and his presence in court should be considered as a duty. No vacation will be required for this purpose. This issue can be resolved under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, especially for employees who were paid wages by check and not by cash, especially when due to insecurity. The proper way to do this was through check and when there was no law. Under which the wages should be paid in cash was optional and not mandatory and the employee had to get leave for that day, it was not even a complaint under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance. The questions raised by her in her complaint were considered under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, instead the academic question was rightly rejected by the Labor Court by the PE Labor Court. had gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
