GUL NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Evidence in the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Pressure on Section 103 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 8 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 38 According to the prosecution's prediction, the timing of his arrest was unnatural and could not be expected. The police did not note the registration number of the vehicle in which the accused was neither arrested nor his The names of the drivers, conductors and passengers who were able to serve independently were discovered. In the absence of any explanation for the witnesses' availability and absence of witnesses at the scene, the accused recovered illegal arms, violated the law and pressured terrorist activity. 8 (Special Courts). ) Act, 1975 and thus, could not play its legal role against the accused before the police officers were also inadmissible for proof, Article 38 of the Convention of Martyrdom, 1984, the accused was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Nowshera lawyer