MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus MUHAMMAD AYUB
Defendants could not be considered transfer of value instead of performing their share of the transfer of land by oral gift because of the specific relief of the contract to sell the vendor to the Special Relief Act 1877, because its transactions I had no idea. In the presence of the gift and the notice that was presented to them as a pre-sale agreement, the defendants cannot be assumed that they have no knowledge of the pre-sale agreement, however, no respondent Alihan did not appear in the witness room to defend the case or to deny the claim. Instead of the plaintiffs, they presented their mother to the plaintiff for this purpose, therefore, failing to prove that they had no knowledge of the original contract, which they were required to establish under the law, and, Like they lost their claim. It may not be appropriate to retain the property as a transfer and in no way prevent the plaintiffs from claiming that they are entitled to compensation in lieu of a fixed fee. On the terms set forth between the parties, the formation of the agreement is therefore a reasonable relief, which decides the appellate court's order and is sustained in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Bagh lawyer