Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

The Punjab Dedicated Properties Ordinance 1979, section 2 (d) and 11 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 14 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), as reported by the Department, assumed its authority on dated 10, 1987 Took over and took control of the land in question, treating the property as dedicated property, hence the applicant's predecessors were allotted in lieu of the land attached to the shrine, which was rejected in the India petition, the notification in question. Instead of challenging them, continue pursuing their case in the appropriate action they have taken on the occasion of the Department of Land and Land Control through Periodicals. The Court of Appeal amended the trial to the extent that the plaintiff was properly presented to the applicant because the trial was not sustained due to the trial. The court petitioner filed the case before the District Judge, which was dismissed as time-barred, which led to the High Court dismissing the notification of legal status in the case of the plaintiff, immediately after the petitioner filed a case through the applicants. It was later filed that the lawsuit was chosen and it was stated that the notification provided within 30 days under Section 11, Waqf Properties Ordinance 1979 was not challenged. law firms from Harnai lawyer