Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL RAZZAK versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN


Defendant for filing constitutional petition to petitioner's Lux Stand for filing vacant property and IDPs Act (1975) section 2 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution. Confirmation of Permanent Transfer Confirmation by the Authority Only interest, which the applicant has been claiming in connection with the property, was his tenant because the applicant's status affected The order was not affected, no personal gain or benefit or obstruction was disclosed in the constitutional application filed by the petitioner. Was. As a result of an invalid order of an applicant's privilege, the applicant, as the tenant only, has no other right or interest in such property, in favor of the respondents, to transfer the property There was no place to file a constitutional petition to challenge. Further, even when he was not involved in the numerous legal proceedings initiated by R, such property was ready for transfer.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.