ABDUL RAZZAK versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Defendant for filing constitutional petition to petitioner's Lux Stand for filing vacant property and IDPs Act (1975) section 2 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution. Confirmation of Permanent Transfer Confirmation by the Authority Only interest, which the applicant has been claiming in connection with the property, was his tenant because the applicant's status affected The order was not affected, no personal gain or benefit or obstruction was disclosed in the constitutional application filed by the petitioner. Was. As a result of an invalid order of an applicant's privilege, the applicant, as the tenant only, has no other right or interest in such property, in favor of the respondents, to transfer the property There was no place to file a constitutional petition to challenge. Further, even when he was not involved in the numerous legal proceedings initiated by R, such property was ready for transfer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Rajanpur lawyer
