TECHNICIANS versus RAHAT BUILDERS
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), a case of specific performance of the OXX, RRL and 2 plaintiffs for sale agreement, in which it called for an interim injunction to transfer the defendant , To keep them out of place or in a circle. Question: The claimant entitled to such interim relief paid as much for his / her acknowledgment as for the reservation / allotment of the house. Such allotment could not be canceled without giving the plaintiff the notice of notice. The plaintiffs show that the defendant is entitled to cancel the reservation / notice of premises after the expiry of 15 days. The letters sent to the claimant by the claimant did not stand on the test given by the defendant himself. Only in these letters it is mentioned that the premises are allotted to a third party while the actual facts have to be crushed. Will The evidence was led by both parties, the plaintiff was presented by the plaintiff The fresh allotment cannot be made in the absence of any substantive material showing the actual cancellation of the plaintiff's reservation, placed before the plaintiff. In the absence of a valid and legally cancellation of the reservation, no rights can be created in favor of the third party, who cannot claim after the latter is allotted. The determination of the allotment in favor of the plaintiff or any other person claiming to be under it or under it may not be allowed to take further steps in respect of the premises enclosed so as to adversely affect the interests of the plaintiff. Maintain status quo with defendant. According to the question
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Mir Ali lawyer