MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus S.A. HAMEED
Representation of Pakistan Act 1976, 52, 55, 67 and 70 Constitution Making of Pakistan (1973), Arts 62 and 63 rejection of election nomination papers The legitimate applicant rejected the appeal against the nomination papers. ? The relevant Legislative Assembly, which came into existence on the basis of the relevant elections, was dissolved during the approval of the election petition. Relief by the applicant claimed that the election of a particular constituency should be completely void and the selection of the candidates. Be directed to hold fresh elections. According to the law from this constituency, which came into existence, it was said that the Governor had dissolved the elections. It was claimed by the petitioner that after the dissolution of the assembly by the applicant, it was declared as denial. Applicants' requests for could not be approved. Legally the applicant sought relief in his constitutional plea which was before it, the provisions of Sections 55 (2), 67 and 70, the Public Representation Act, 1976, thus, cannot be granted on grounds that the election. Petition was not requested, cannot be allowed to be provoked. Candidates' papers were rejected by the candidate through election request; he was not a candidate, so he could not file the election petition grounds on which the selection of the returning candidate could be declared invalid because his nomination was invalid or he was Ineligible or ineligible or unable to be elected a member of the ensemble petitioner, however, he did not controversially make such a request that he be terminated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Guddu lawyer