Find a Lawyer

IKRAM HASSAN KHAN versus SAJJAD AZIZ BHATTI

Code of Civil Code 1908 Section 35 Non-payment of costs to a successful party The jurisdiction generally brought to the successful party was entitled to litigation, however, the court refused to pay the successful party, reasons. Must be recorded by the court for doing so, although discretion exercised under the discretionary powers of the court and exercised by the trial court should not be lightly interfered with by the superior court, however, such a principle must be made at the same time. Applies when the discretion is used correctly. The general rule is that, pursuant to the costs / incident, a successful patent can only be denied litigation costs because the plaintiff's refusal to pay costs for a good cause was not permanent, none of it No, the trial court gave the reason for not paying the costs through the trial, although it was deemed necessary to do so through section 35 (2), CPC which emphasized its terms through superior. No special feature of this case was found. The court that would prevent the plaintiff from recovering costs was itself found by the trial court to be a valid claim and was borne by the record trial court through evidence, thus the decision of the plaintiff's trial. Refusal to pay plaintiff costs was unlawfully acted upon. The direction was amended with the direction that the costs of the appeal would be borne by the defendants. family advocate from Mubarik Pur lawyer