QAMAR-UZ-ZAMAN versus STATE
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 497 (1), Third Proviso Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149 Bail in a case initiated by the High Court on legal delay. The complainant presented by the order cannot be attributed to the accused, as the basis for summoning the jurisdiction of the court and thereafter being attracted to the proceedings cannot be established unless it is clear. Not to be held exclusively and exclusively by the court. The total duration of the two meetings sought by the accused was only 63 days, which was delayed by 975 days, despite the same reduction of the previous 1038 days after the detention of the accused. Because of the prosecution. Arguing that the case has begun and the five prosecution witnesses have been testified, the accused cannot be released on bail, as he had no power because b has the right to be an extension suspect. Under Section 497 (1) of the Third Section, the CCP cannot be denied for having a legal guarantee that under the discretionary power of the court the accused was allowed to pass bail, neither the former offender nor the strict, Were hopeless or dangerous criminals and in these situations they were entitled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kalar Syedian lawyer