Find a Lawyer

NEW JUBILEE INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Customs Act 1969 Sections 193 and 195 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Petitioner for payment of payment of customs duty to an insurance company is not an alternative to maintenance of petition. On receipt of such notice, instead of seeking the treatment of tax and other charges, appeals and revisions in the case of imported goods in Pakistan, a constitutional petition was filed demanding that the customs authority's demand and proposed action be illegal, Illegal, Malalai Elastic, arbitrary and without legal authority and jurisdiction, the applicants alleged that the treatment provided by the Appeal and Review was inadequate and that these remedies could not be considered appropriate treatment, therefore, S3 193. And in 195 terms, this finding was not binding. O, Customs Act, 1969 Applicants who requested unnecessary and premature High Court constitutional jurisdiction when they had alternative methods of appeal and review were not allowed to say that the Department The treatment was nothing but extravagant. It was allowed to prevail on such an argument that such an end would not be abolished, except on the basis of a constitutional request to revoke the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court without resorting to the provisions provided by law. It was not practicable to remain apart of the courts. In addition to the courts, the jurisdiction was also prohibited in view of the sanctioned position which led to the complete action without territorial jurisdiction. The fact of the High Court in Lahore that the petitioner in Karachi immigration advocates phone number from Bhakkar lawyer