Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMID versus STATE

Applicants who were entitled to property rights under section 19 and 30 of the Colonization Act 1912 of the Government Land (Punjab), who had been subordinate to the state land tenant for ten years, claimed property rights under the scheme as the land was disputed. All tenants are eligible for proprietary rights Sub-tenants were required to be in continuous cultivation on land before Kharif, 1977, but the concerned Khusraw Gurdwaras said that before that period, any of the sub-tenants There was no continuous cultivation at the place, revenue records further indicated that the sub-tenant remained Was. Applicants to occupy the land even after the tenancy of the original tenant expired, since the Kharif was not established as a tenant before 1977 and all other conditions were not fulfilled. Relevant notices were not eligible for grant of proprietary rights under Land, the dispute remained under unauthorized cultivation of the applicants, they could be treacherous, since the lease of their respective areas on temporary lease and market rate rent from them. May be recovered up to the period in which they were occupied. immigration advocates from Kalam lawyer