Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD AJMAL

Section 2 (4) and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Settlement Scheme No IX Constitution Petition for the Disposal of Individuals (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958, which effectively occupied the port of property in dispute. Was moved. The applicant, who did not apply for transfer of property in his possession, later applied for the transfer of the Settlement Rules and the introduction of the applicants / occupants of the Settlement Scheme IX ? Applicants rejected settlement claim about 20 years before the entire property in dispute disputed, nothing available for transfer to applicants / occupants under Settlement Scheme No: IX Respondent / Transfer to The house was relocated, as stated in the relevant law, consisting only of the built up section and any area more than three times its sixth area shall remain uncontested and the transfer under Settlement Scheme No. IX The only question before the administrator was whether there was any area beyond the respondents / transferrs No more than three can be constructed other than the built-up area, this aspect of the matter was not considered by the organizers but before the applicants / occupiers' claim was rejected, it was remanded to consider this aspect of the case. To determine if the applicant / occupier owned the property or not if he found out that the property in the possession of the applicants was made by the applicant himself and not by his vacant owner, administrator, It would be a legal obligation top advocates from Qambar lawyer