Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ IQBAL versus ZIA-UR-REHMAN

The allotment of Ahata in the dispute made by the Collector in favor of the Colonization Section 10 Elite / Allies of Government Land (Punjab) Act 1912, was canceled by the Additional Commissioner on the ground that the Ahata in the dispute was for public welfare. Ihata was for public welfare, but it was in the possession of Appellant / Altis for the past 10/15 years and they had built a house on it. Appellant / Altis paid the current price of Ahata in dispute and the Colonies. 50% surcharge according to the letters of the Department of Ataahi approval of the allotment at such stage was not appropriate best law firms from Peshawar lawyer