Conviction Evidence Order 1984 Article 59 Expert opinion on filing a case for recovery of money by the plaintiff, the trial court directed that the signatures on the disputed documents be sent for comparison, the trial court order Had challenged that expert opinion could not be obtained. Prior to the recording of the evidence, the defendant's confession was void because nothing was available in Article 59 of the Law Evidence, 1984, whereby the court was barred from obtaining expert opinion until The evidence was not completed by the parties, thus they were committed. The trial court allowed the plaintiff to seek expert opinion
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
