Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM NIZAMI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Sections 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13 of the Punjab Essential Articles (Control) Act 1973 (Second Amendment) Ordinance (Constitution of 1994), Section 2 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts The constitutional petition against the constitutional application of 89, Sections 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13, the Punjab Essential Articles (Control) Act 1973, challenged such challenge to the Touchstone of Article 128 of the Constitution Ground. As the applicant has said. The act was to remain operative for 10 years but after that the duration of its operation was increased to 20 years. By the ordinance, the Act was repealed but could not be placed before the Assembly, which resulted in the termination of the new ordinance on the same line which was published in the Official Gazette on 6 1 1994, even though the Governor 2 were signed. 1994; The Assembly passed the Ordinance within time and it became a permanent petitioner's objection that the Punjab Essential Articles (Control) (Second Amendment) Ordinance 1994 was published on 6-6 1994, to this date. Will be considered operative, was not guaranteed. This ordinance was signed by the Governor on 2 by 1994 as the Gazette notification shows that the Ordinance I of 1994 was approved by the Assembly on 27 2 1994, it will be deemed to have been implemented as soon as the Governor has signed the petition. Will In the official Gazette there was no nexus of the ordinance from the day that the implementation of this ordinance would take effect and the signing of the Governor / President would be effective immediately, unless otherwise stated in the ordinance. I was introduced under Ordinance I of 1994, thus, it shall be deemed to have come into force on 1993. 1994 immigration advocates from Jaranwala lawyer