Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

I.T.A. NO.4456/LB OF 1992-93 versus I.T.A. NO.4456/LB OF 1992-93


Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 22 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981, R20 (2) The revenue from the factory case was selected for the total audit and it was confirmed in the appeal of the test. It was reported that the complaint before the Tribunal was that no diagnosis was made in parallel. To cite any parallel case in which the matter is being examined before the Tribunal where a lower rate is applicable. No material substitution was found in the appeal as the appellate order was properly diagnosed on the basis of a parallel case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.